Back  ·   Table of Contents  ·   Next

Rescission -


[1]
Elements and Case Citations

(1) The character or relationship of the parties;

(2) The making of the contract;

(3) The existence of fraud, mutual mistake, false representation, impossibility of performance, or other ground for rescission or cancellation;

(4) Plaintiff has rescinded the contract and notified defendant of such rescission;

(5) If the plaintiff has received benefits from the contract, the plaintiff should further allege an offer to restore those benefits to the defendant, if restoration is possible; and

(6) Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.

____________________________________

Florida State Courts

Supreme Court: E.F. Hutton & Co. v. Rousseff, 537 So. 2d 978, 980 (Fla. 1989)

Second District: Saenz v. Rigau & Rigau, P.A., 549 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)

Fourth District: Billian v. Mobil Corp., 710 So. 2d 984, 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)

Florida Federal Courts

Eleventh Circuit: Rousseff v. E.F. Hutton Co., 867 F.2d 1281, 1285 (11th Cir. 1989)

Southern District: Capital Factors, Inc. v. Heller Financial, Inc., 712 F. Supp. 908, 915 (S.D. Fla. 1989)

Florida Statutes

§ 672.608, Fla. Stat.

[2] Defenses to Claim for Rescission

(1) Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.110(d) (pleading affirmative defenses), and other standard defenses. See § 56.

(2) Statute of Limitations: § 95.11(3)(l), Fla. Stat. (four years).

(3) Courts should not allow claims for rescission when plaintiff may pursue action at law for breach of warranty or contract. See Central Florida Antenna Serv., Inc. v. A.M. Crabtree, 503 So. 2d 1351, 1352 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

(4) Rescission is available only for fraud, accident or mistake. See Royal v. Parado, 462 So. 2d 849, 855 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); but see Hibiscus Assoc., Ltd., v. Bd. of Trustees, 50 F.3d 908, 916 (11th Cir. 1995) (Florida law also allows rescission for breach of dependant covenant).

(5) Rescission is not available when the parties cannot return to positions occupied prior to execution of contract. See Paul Revere Life Ins. Co. v. Dietz, 785 F. Supp. 970, 972 (M.D. Fla. 1992).

Back  ·   Table of Contents  ·   Next

 
© 2004-2008 The Florida Litigation Guide. All rights reserved.  Privacy  Terms of Use  
About The Author About The Guide The Complete Guide Testimonials Legal Research Sites Home Home Wites & Kapetan, P.A. Wites & Kapetan, P.A. Wites & Kapetan, P.A.