Back  ·   Table of Contents  ·   Next

Breach Implied Covenant of Good Faith & Fair Dealing –


[1] Elements and Case Citations

(1) Plaintiff and Defendant are parties to a written contract:

(2) The contract is ambiguous about the permissibility or scope of the conduct in question;

(3) Defendant, through a conscious and deliberate act, fails or refuses to discharge contractual responsibilities that unfairly frustrates the contract’s purpose and disappoints the Plaintiff’s expectations;

(4) Defendant’s breach deprives the Plaintiff of the contract’s benefits; and

(5) Plaintiff suffers damages.

 

____________________________________

Florida State Courts

First District: Cox v. CSX Intermodal, Inc., 732 So. 2d 1092, 1097 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)

Fourth District: Meruelo v. Mark Andrew of Palm Beaches, Ltd., 4D07-49832009 WL 1212051, *2+ (Fla. 4th DCA May 06, 2009)

Florida Federal Courts

Eleventh Circuit: Burger King v. Weaver, 169 F.3d 1310, 1318 (11th Cir. 1999).

Southern District: Barnes v. Burger King Corp., 932 F. Supp. 1420, 1437-40 (S.D. Fla. 1996)

Middle District: American Color Graphics, Inc. v. Eckerd Corp., NO. 8:05-CV-1512-T-TBM 2008 WL 2914982, *6 (M.D. Fla., July 25, 2008)

[2] Defenses to Claim for Breach Implied Covenant of Good Faith & Fair Dealing

(1) Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.110(d) (pleading affirmative defenses), and other standard defenses. See § 60.

(2) Statute of Limitations: § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (four years).

(3) Action cannot be maintained “(a) in derogation of the express terms of the underlying contract or (b) in the absence of breach of an express term of the underlying contract.” See Burger King v. Weaver, 169 F.3d 1310, 1318 (11th Cir. 1999).

(4) The covenant does not apply where the contract’s express terms define the permissibility of the conduct. Shibata v. Lim, 133 F. Supp. 2d 1311, (M.D. Fla. 2000).

(5) Action not available in cases based on breach of at-will employment contract. Kelly v. Gill, 544 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

(6) Claim is subject to dismissal as redundant where the conduct at issue is duplicative of breach of contract claim. Shibata v. Lim, 133 F. Supp. 2d 1311, (M.D. Fla. 2000).

Back  ·   Table of Contents  ·   Next

 
© 2004-2008 The Florida Litigation Guide. All rights reserved.  Privacy  Terms of Use  
About The Author About The Guide The Complete Guide Testimonials Legal Research Sites Home Home Wites & Kapetan, P.A. Wites & Kapetan, P.A. Wites & Kapetan, P.A.